<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the case for PHP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveyshafik.com/archives/640-making-the-case-for-php.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveyshafik.com/archives/640-making-the-case-for-php.html</link>
	<description>As close to my brain as you can safely get...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:32:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tibo Beijen</title>
		<link>http://daveyshafik.com/archives/640-making-the-case-for-php.html/comment-page-1#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Tibo Beijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveyshafik.com/?p=640#comment-168</guid>
		<description>The open culture of the PHP community is highly appreciated by the community itself but my feeling is that a great part of the enterprise level businesses are a bit more conservative. 

They tend to stick to .NET or java because of partnerships with companies like Microsoft and IBM and the of course the &#039;certification circus&#039;. As I&#039;ve seen it described elsewhere: It&#039;s a &#039;different eco-system&#039;. For PHP there is just less black-on-white &#039;proof of quaility&#039; (note the quotes) to judge possible suppliers and employees by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The open culture of the PHP community is highly appreciated by the community itself but my feeling is that a great part of the enterprise level businesses are a bit more conservative. </p>
<p>They tend to stick to .NET or java because of partnerships with companies like Microsoft and IBM and the of course the &#8216;certification circus&#8217;. As I&#8217;ve seen it described elsewhere: It&#8217;s a &#8216;different eco-system&#8217;. For PHP there is just less black-on-white &#8216;proof of quaility&#8217; (note the quotes) to judge possible suppliers and employees by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davey Shafik&#8217;s Blog: Making the case for PHP &#124; Webs Developer</title>
		<link>http://daveyshafik.com/archives/640-making-the-case-for-php.html/comment-page-1#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Davey Shafik&#8217;s Blog: Making the case for PHP &#124; Webs Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveyshafik.com/?p=640#comment-166</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent post to his blog Davey Shafik proposes that you take a look from another angle when considering what to use for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent post to his blog Davey Shafik proposes that you take a look from another angle when considering what to use for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherif Mansour</title>
		<link>http://daveyshafik.com/archives/640-making-the-case-for-php.html/comment-page-1#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherif Mansour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveyshafik.com/?p=640#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Great write-up. I had to go through something similar in an organisation recently - PHP vs Java. Agree on your comments its not &quot;vs&quot;. You made some good points there.

There other point I&#039;d like to bring to the table is something I like to call &quot;the right technology for the right solution&quot;.

If you were going to build an application with an estimated 500 rows - why would you use Oracle? Its a bloated solution that might be &quot;overkill for what you need&quot;. You might use something like MySQL or even SQLite.

The same thoughts apply to the application layer. Java - powerful - very much so. But if i wanted a simple application to display the results of a table, I might use a scripting language, like PHP/Python. If I wanted to build an application that needed to be multi-threaded, I&#039;d use Java.

So its not just because there are lots of developers in PHP (or whatever it might be), It&#039;s also making sure we use the right technology for the right solution. 

Sherif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write-up. I had to go through something similar in an organisation recently &#8211; PHP vs Java. Agree on your comments its not &#8220;vs&#8221;. You made some good points there.</p>
<p>There other point I&#8217;d like to bring to the table is something I like to call &#8220;the right technology for the right solution&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you were going to build an application with an estimated 500 rows &#8211; why would you use Oracle? Its a bloated solution that might be &#8220;overkill for what you need&#8221;. You might use something like MySQL or even SQLite.</p>
<p>The same thoughts apply to the application layer. Java &#8211; powerful &#8211; very much so. But if i wanted a simple application to display the results of a table, I might use a scripting language, like PHP/Python. If I wanted to build an application that needed to be multi-threaded, I&#8217;d use Java.</p>
<p>So its not just because there are lots of developers in PHP (or whatever it might be), It&#8217;s also making sure we use the right technology for the right solution. </p>
<p>Sherif</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
